[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
	European Court of Human Rights
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> Atanas KOLEV v the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia - 29150/06 [2008] ECHR 1804 (2 December 2008) URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2008/1804.html Cite as: [2008] ECHR 1804

[New search] [Contents list] [Printable RTF version] [Help]

FIFTH SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 29150/06
by Atanas KOLEV
against the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia

The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 2 December 2008 as a Chamber composed of:

Peer Lorenzen, President,
Rait Maruste,
Karel Jungwiert,
Renate Jaeger,
Mark Villiger,
Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,
Zdravka Kalaydjieva, judges,
and Claudia Westerdiek, Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above application lodged on 30 June 2006,

Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

THE FACTS

The applicant, Mr Atanas Kolev, is a Macedonian national who was born in 1942 and lives in Skopje. The Macedonian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, R. Lazareska Gerovska.

The application concerns criminal proceedings in which the applicant was convicted for sexual assault of a child (полов напад врз дете) and sexual harassment by abuse of power (обљуба со злоупотреба на положбата). The proceedings in question started on 21 January 1998 when the bill of indictment was lodged against the applicant. They ended with the Supreme Court's judgment of 14 July 2006.

COMPLAINTS

The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention that his case had not been heard within a reasonable time. He further complained that he had been put at a disadvantageous position vis-à-vis the public prosecutor. Lastly, the applicant alleged that the domestic courts had lacked the requisite impartiality.

THE LAW

On 10 July 2008 the Court received the following declaration from the respondent Government:

“I, Radica Lazareska Gerovska, Agent of the Government, declare that the Government of the Republic of Macedonia offer to pay ex gratia 2,000 euros to
Mr Atanas Kolev with a view to securing a friendly settlement of the above-mentioned case pending before the European Court of Human Rights.

This sum, which is to cover any non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, will be converted into Macedonian Denars at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and free of any taxes that may be applicable. It will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case.”

On 27 August 2008 the Court received a declaration, duly signed by the applicant, which read, inter alia, as follows:

“I, Atanas Kolev, the applicant, note that the Government of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia are prepared to pay me ex gratia the sum of 2,000 euros with a view to securing a friendly settlement of the above-mentioned case pending before the European Court of Human Rights ... I accept the proposal and waive any further claims against the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia in respect of the facts giving rise to this application. I declare that this constitutes a final resolution of the case.”

The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no public policy reasons to justify a continued examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention). In view of the above, it should be struck out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court unanimously

Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.

Claudia Westerdiek Peer Lorenzen
Registrar President