BOROVKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - 46694/21 (Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association : Third Section Committee) [2024] ECHR 239 (21 March 2024)


BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

European Court of Human Rights


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> BOROVKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - 46694/21 (Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association : Third Section Committee) [2024] ECHR 239 (21 March 2024)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2024/239.html
Cite as: [2024] ECHR 239

[New search] [Contents list] [Help]


 

 

THIRD SECTION

CASE OF BOROVKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

(Applications nos. 46694/21 and 23 others -

see appended list)

 

 

 

 

 

 

JUDGMENT

 

STRASBOURG

21 March 2024

 

This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.


In the case of Borovkov and Others v. Russia,

The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:

 Peeter Roosma, President,
 Ioannis Ktistakis,
 Andreas Zünd, judges,

and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having deliberated in private on 22 February 2024,

Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:

PROCEDURE


1.  The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") on the various dates indicated in the appended table.


2.  The Russian Government ("the Government") were given notice of the applications.

THE FACTS


3.  The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.


4.  The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. All of the applicants, except for the applicant in application no. 51989/21, also raised other complaints under the Convention.

THE LAW

  1. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS


5.  Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.

  1. JURISDICTION


6.  The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68-73, 17 January 2023).

  1. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION


7.  The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.


8.  The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006-XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).


9.  In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.


10.  Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants' freedom of assembly were not "necessary in a democratic society".


11.  These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.

  1. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW


12.  Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.


13.  Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); and Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention.

  1. REMAINING COMPLAINTS


14.  Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning other aspects of fairness of the administrative-offence proceedings. In view of the findings in the above paragraphs, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.

  1. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION


15.  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,

  1. Decides to join the applications;
  2. Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with the applicants' complaints as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;
  3. Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention;
  4. Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention;
  5. Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocols thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table);
  6. Holds

(a)  that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;

(b)  that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

Done in English, and notified in writing on 21 March 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.

 Viktoriya Maradudina Peeter Roosma
 Acting Deputy Registrar President

 

 


APPENDIX

List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention

(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)

No.

Application no.

Date of introduction

Applicant's name

Year of birth

 

Representative's name and location

Name of the public event

Location

Date

Administrative charges

Penalty

Final domestic decision

Court Name

Date

Other complaints under well-established case-law

Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant

(in euros)

[1]

  1.    

46694/21

07/08/2021

Artem Valeryevich BOROVKOV

1995

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

detention for 13 days

Moscow City Court

08/02/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.20 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 8.10 p.m. on 01/02/2021;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;

 

Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO

5,000

  1.    

46701/21

07/08/2021

Artem Gennadyevich NIKIFOROV

1990

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

02/02/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 20,000

Moscow City Court

10/03/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 11.10 a.m. on 02/02/2021 until 2.00 a.m. on 03/02/2021;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.    

47661/21

15/09/2021

Anastasiya Yevgenyevna ILYINA

2002

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich

Vilnius

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Ulyanovsk

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Ulyanovsk Regional Court

25/03/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.    

48059/21

11/09/2021

Ruslan Aleksandrovich ROZHNEV

1996

Soboleva Yelena Aleksandrovna

Izhevsk

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Izhevsk

 

21/04/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Supreme Court of the Udmurtia Republic

21/06/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 21/04/2021 for compiling an offence report;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.    

48965/21

24/09/2021

Anton Sergeyevich ZHIGALOV

1982

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich

Vilnius

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Kaliningrad

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 20,000

Kaliningrad Regional Court

30/03/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report

4,000

  1.    

49777/21

17/09/2021

Nikita Nikolayevich RODIONOV

1998

 

 

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Chelyabinsk

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Chelyabinsk Regional Court

17/03/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

3,500

  1.    

49911/21

17/09/2021

Konstantin Nikolayevich OKUNEV

1968

 

 

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Perm

 

31/01/2021

 

 

 

article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

detention for 5 days

Perm Regional Court

24/03/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to police station on 02/02/2021 for compiling an offence report,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

5,000

  1.    

49932/21

18/09/2021

Ilya Pavlovich LEVIN

1998

Nechiporenko Natalya Aleksandrovna

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

18/03/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.    

50165/21

22/09/2021

Denis Valentinovich ORLOV

1990

Soboleva Yelena Aleksandrovna

Izhevsk

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Izhevsk

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Supreme Court of the Udmurtia Republic

24/05/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.  

50167/21

23/09/2021

Aleksey Nikolayevich GOLOVKO

1998

Shindyapin Arkadiy Vitalyevich

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

Moscow City Court

17/05/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.  

50222/21

29/09/2021

Alina Alekseyevna STELMASHENKO

2001

Zubarev Dmitriy Vladimirovich

Vladivostok

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Vladivostok

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

Primorye Regional Court

27/04/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;

 

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

 

 

 

4,000

  1.  

50230/21

29/09/2021

Kirill Borisovich CHISTYAKOV

1980

Zubarev Dmitriy Vladimirovich

Vladivostok

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Vladivostok

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

Primorye Regional Court

13/04/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.  

50255/21

29/09/2021

Anna Aleksandrovna SAPRONOVA

1997

Zubarev Dmitriy Vladimirovich

Vladivostok

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Vladivostok

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

Primorye Regional Court

17/05/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report

 

 

4,000

  1.  

50884/21

05/10/2021

Anna Andreyevna NAZAROVA

1993

Solovyev Stanislav Vyacheslavovich

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

23/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

Moscow City Court

06/04/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.  

51227/21

08/10/2021

Oleg Sergeyevich GOLOTYAK

1977

Chashchilova Mariya Valeryevna

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

13/05/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

 

 

 

 

4,000

  1.  

51234/21

01/10/2021

Aleksey Alekseyevich DEMENTYEV

1981

Olgerdt Oksana Gennadyevna

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

03/02/2021

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

detention for 10 days

Moscow City Court

02/04/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for more than twenty hours on 03/02/2021 after the offence record was drawn up;

 

Art. 6 (1) - unfair criminal proceedings - various deficiencies of the administrative offence proceedings (no possibility to adduce evidence)

5,000

  1.  

51532/21

01/10/2021

Andrey Aleksandrovich SHEVCHENKO

2002

 

 

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Penza

 

23/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

Penza Regional Court

01/04/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 31/01/2021;

 

 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

 

 

4,000

  1.  

51596/21

08/10/2021

Leonid Vladimirovich NIKONISHIN

1991

 

 

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Voronezh

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10.000

Voronezh Regional Court

13/04/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station between 4 p.m. and 10 p.m. on 31/01/2021 after compiling an offence report;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

 

4,000

  1.  

51989/21

12/10/2021

Lyubov Dmitriyevna MISHINA

2002

Benyash Mikhail Mikhaylovich

Krasnodar

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Krasnodar

 

31/01/2021

 

 

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Krasnodar Regional Court

24/05/2021

 

3,500

  1.  

52009/21

08/10/2021

Marina Mikhaylovna PODVALNAYA

1995

Nazarov Ilya Yulyevich

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

02/02/2021

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

detention for 5 days

Moscow City Court

12/04/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report between 11 p.m. on 02/02/2021 and 5.30 p.m. on 03/02/2021;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

 

5,000

  1.  

52015/21

08/10/2021

Anna Sergeyevna MINCHENKO

1996

Nazarov Ilya Yulyevich

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

02/02/2021

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

detention for 5 days

Moscow City Court

12/04/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report between 11 p.m. on 02/02/2021 and 5 p.m. on 03/02/2021;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

5,000

  1.  

52244/21

01/10/2021

Gordey Yevgenyevich SIVKOV

1990

Levenberg Yeva Viktorovna

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

23/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

21/06/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report between 4.35 p.m. and 9.40 p.m. on 23/01/2021;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

 

4,000

  1.  

52471/21

04/10/2021

Sergey Nikolayevich PANASYUK

1990

Sidelnikova Polina Aleksandrovna

Vladivostok

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Vladivostok

 

31/01/2021

 

 

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Primorye Regional Court

19/04/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.  

52564/21

05/10/2021

Dmitriy Andreyevich BEREZNIKOV

1996

Sivoldayev Ilya Vladimirovich

Voronezh

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Voronezh

 

23/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Voronezh Regional Court

05/04/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

3,500

 

 


[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2024/239.html