BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

European Court of Human Rights


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> V.P. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - 33140/15 (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture : Third Section Committee) [2024] ECHR 854 (07 November 2024)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2024/854.html
Cite as: [2024] ECHR 854

[New search] [Contents list] [Help]


 

THIRD SECTION

CASE OF V.P. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

(Applications nos. 33140/15 and 38 others –

see appended list)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

JUDGMENT

 

STRASBOURG

7 November 2024

 

This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.


In the case of V.P. and Others v. Russia,

The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:

          Ioannis Ktistakis, President,
          Oddný Mjöll Arnardóttir,
          Diana Kovatcheva, judges,

and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having deliberated in private on 10 October 2024,

Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:

PROCEDURE


1.  The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") on the various dates indicated in the appended table.


2.  The Russian Government were given notice of the applications.

THE FACTS


3.  The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.


4.  The applicants complained that, as "outcast" inmates, they faced a risk of treatment prohibited by Article 3 of the Convention due to segregation, humiliating practices, and abuse in their daily lives while in detention. They highlighted the heightened risk of inter-prisoner violence due to prison hierarchy, the authorities' failure to address that risk, and the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law. Some applicants raised additional complaints under the Convention, stemming from the same set of facts.

THE LAW

I.        JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS


5.  Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.

II.     Jurisdiction


6.  The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68‑73, 17 January 2023).

III.   ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLEs 3 AND 13 of the Convention


7.  The applicants complained of inhuman and degrading treatment in Russian penal facilities due to their inferior position within an informal prisoner hierarchy and the alleged lack of effective domestic remedies for their complaints in that regard. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention.


8.  In the leading cases of S.P. and Others v. Russia (nos. 36463/11 and 10 others, 2 May 2023) and D v. Latvia (no. 76680/17, 11 January 2024), the Court already found violations of Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. The Court held that the physical and symbolic separation of "outcast" prisoners, coupled with restricted access to basic prison resources and denial of human contact, caused mental anxiety exceeding the unavoidable level of suffering inherent in detention, even when they were not subjected to physical violence or threats of violence (see S.P. and Others, cited above, § 96, and D v. Latvia, cited above, § 51). It also found that the domestic authorities had not taken adequate steps to protect the applicants from the treatment associated with their belonging to the stigmatised group or implemented effective mechanisms to improve their situation or address the issue comprehensively.


9.  Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of these complaints. It finds that the applicants belonged to the stigmatised group of prisoners and endured degrading treatment on that account. They also did not have access to an effective remedy in respect of these complaints.


10.  These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention.

IV.  REMAINING COMPLAINTS


11.  In the light of its findings concerning the applicants' complaints under Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention, the Court takes the view that it has examined the main legal question raised in respect of their situation and does not need to give a separate ruling on the admissibility or merits of the remaining complaints (see, for a similar approach, Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014).

V.    APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION


12.  Regard being had to the material in its possession and to its case‑law (see S.P. and Others, cited above, § 114), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table and dismisses the remainder of the applicants' claims for just satisfaction.

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,

1.      Decides to join the applications;

2.      Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;

3.      Declares the complaints under Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention admissible and decides that there is no need to examine the remainder of the complaints;

4.      Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention;

5.      Holds

(a)  that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;

(b)  that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points;

6.      Dismisses the remainder of the applicants' claims for just satisfaction.

Done in English, and notified in writing on 7 November 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.

      Viktoriya Maradudina                                            Ioannis Ktistakis
    Acting Deputy Registrar                                                President

 


APPENDIX

List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention

(inhuman and degrading treatment of outcast inmates as a result of segregation, humiliating practices and abuse in their daily life while in detention, heightened risk of inter-prisoner violence (prison hierarchy))

No.

Application no.

Date of introduction

Applicant's initials

Year of birth

 

Representative's name and location

Facility

Start and end date

Other complaints under well-established case-law

Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant

(in euros) [1]

1.       

33140/15

20/01/2016

 

V.P.

1963

Valentina Aleksandrovna BOKAREVA

Moscow

IK-2 Zabaykalskiy Region

12/02/2011 - date of introduction

 

20,000

2.       

44449/15

25/08/2015

 

V.O.

1986

Aleksandr Vladimirovich VINOGRADOV

Kostroma

IK-1 Kostroma

 

19/02/2012 - 08/06/2015

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law

20,000

3.       

46378/15

07/09/2015

 

A.S.

1978

Aleksandr Vladimirovich VINOGRADOV

Kostroma

IK-7 Kostroma Region

 

22/05/2007 - 16/07/2015

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law

20,000

4.       

46694/15

04/09/2015

 

M.S.

1982

Aleksandr Vladimirovich VINOGRADOV

Kostroma

IK-1 Kostroma

 

05/11/2013 - 10/06/2015

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law

20,000

5.       

59230/15

09/11/2015

 

D.Y.

1992

Aleksandr Vladimirovich VINOGRADOV

Kostroma

IK-2 Kostroma Region

 

14/08/2011 - 23/06/2015

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law

20,000

6.       

59743/15

09/11/2015

 

D.Z.

1984

Aleksandr Vladimirovich VINOGRADOV

Kostroma

IK-1 Kostroma

 

14/01/2015 - 09/09/2015

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law

20,000

7.       

60150/15

09/11/2015

 

A.B.

1981

Aleksandr Vladimirovich VINOGRADOV

Kostroma

IK-1 Kostroma

 

25/09/2014 - 31/08/2015

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law

20,000

8.       

60284/15

09/11/2015

 

V.K.

1990

Aleksandr Vladimirovich VINOGRADOV

Kostroma

IK-2 Kostroma Region

 

08/02/2010 - 26/08/2015

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law

20,000

9.       

41181/16

04/07/2016

 

S.Y.

1979

Aleksandr Vladimirovich VINOGRADOV

Kostroma

IK-1 Kostroma

 

06/11/1998 - at least until the date of introduction

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law

20,000

10.    

61978/16

18/10/2016

 

V.K.

1986

Aleksandr Vladimirovich VINOGRADOV

Kostroma

IK-1 Kostroma

 

29/01/2016 - 06/09/2016

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law

20,000

11.    

78399/16

29/11/2016

 

Y.M.

1975

Aleksandr Vladimirovich VINOGRADOV

Kostroma

IK-1 Kostroma

 

28/01/2014 - 25/11/2016

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law

20,000

12.    

51807/17

04/07/2017

 

T.R.

1991

Aleksandr Vladimirovich VINOGRADOV

Kostroma

IK-4 Kostroma Region

 

15/02/2014 - 30/06/2017

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law

20,000

13.    

71029/17

15/09/2017

 

A.C.

1982

Aleksandr Vladimirovich VINOGRADOV

Kostroma

IK-4 Kostroma Region

 

07/07/2013 - 01/09/2017

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law

20,000

14.    

71326/17

12/09/2017

 

I.S.

1993

Aleksandr Vladimirovich VINOGRADOV

Kostroma

IK-2 Kostroma Region

 

01/05/2017 - 31/08/2017

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law

20,000

15.    

78092/17

21/12/2017

 

A.B.

1969

Laptev Aleksey Nikolayevich

Moscow

IK-11 Nizhniy Novgorod Region

 

03/10/2011 - 03/10/2017

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law

20,000

16.    

79222/17

10/11/2017

 

A.A.

1984

Aleksandr Vladimirovich VINOGRADOV

Kostroma

IK-1 Kostroma

 

28/12/2016 - 27/09/2017

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law

20,000

17.    

79233/17

10/11/2017

 

G.O.

1980

Aleksandr Vladimirovich VINOGRADOV

Kostroma

IK-1 Kostroma

 

02/11/2015 - 01/11/2017

 

 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law

20,000

18.    

79770/17

08/11/2017

 

S.S.

1987

Aleksandr Vladimirovich VINOGRADOV

Kostroma

IK-1 Kostroma

 

26/07/2013 - 24/10/2017

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law

20,000

19.    

79772/17

08/11/2017

 

M.G.

1981

Aleksandr Vladimirovich VINOGRADOV

Kostroma

IK-1 Kostroma

 

19/05/2016 - 18/08/2017

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law

20,000

20.    

79775/17

08/11/2017

 

A.G.

1983

Aleksandr Vladimirovich VINOGRADOV

Kostroma

IK-1 Kostroma

 

12/05/2008 - 25/07/2017

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law

20,000

21.    

79776/17

08/11/2017

 

S.Z.

1991

Aleksandr Vladimirovich VINOGRADOV

Kostroma

IK-1 Kostroma

 

20/06/2016 - 19/07/2017

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law

20,000

22.    

79951/17

14/11/2017

 

A.C.

1990

Aleksandr Vladimirovich VINOGRADOV

Kostroma

IK-1 Kostroma

 

22/06/2014 - 20/10/2017

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law

20,000

23.    

80357/17

17/11/2017

 

A.G.

1988

Aleksandr Vladimirovich VINOGRADOV

Kostroma

IK-1 Kostroma

 

18/01/2000 - 17/11/2017

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law

20,000

24.    

80725/17

21/11/2017

 

A.I.

1984

Aleksandr Vladimirovich VINOGRADOV

Kostroma

IK-1 Kostroma

 

28/02/2014 - 25/08/2017

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law

20,000

25.    

82160/17

28/11/2017

 

A.K.

1984

Aleksandr Vladimirovich VINOGRADOV

Kostroma

IK-1 Kostroma

 

15/09/2015 - 14/11/2017

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law

20,000

26.    

83674/17

21/11/2017

 

V.B.

1986

Aleksandr Vladimirovich VINOGRADOV

Kostroma

IK-5 Tatarstan

 

2007 - the end of 2017

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law

20,000

27.    

84167/17

08/12/2017

 

V.K.

1986

Aleksandr Vladimirovich VINOGRADOV

Kostroma

IK-1 Kostroma

 

08/12/2015 - 05/12/2017

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law

20,000

28.    

1135/18

12/12/2017

 

S.M.

1975

Aleksandr Vladimirovich VINOGRADOV

Kostroma

IK-4 Kostroma Region

 

17/01/2012 - 21/11/2017

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law

20,000

29.    

4506/18

23/12/2017

 

R.S.

1988

Aleksandr Vladimirovich VINOGRADOV

Kostroma

IK-1 Kostroma

 

23/06/2003 - 22/12/2017

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law

20,000

30.    

4512/18

23/12/2017

 

A.V.

1976

Aleksandr Vladimirovich VINOGRADOV

Kostroma

IK-1 Kostroma

 

20/06/2016 - 14/12/2017

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law

20,000

31.    

6766/18

17/01/2018

 

M.S.

1988

Aleksandr Vladimirovich VINOGRADOV

Kostroma

IK-4 Kostroma Region

 

10/03/2016 - 19/12/2017

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law

20,000

32.    

9879/18

12/02/2018

 

A.K.

1980

Aleksandr Vladimirovich VINOGRADOV

Kostroma

IK-1 Kostroma

 

06/09/2014 - 29/12/2017

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law

20,000

33.    

9930/18

30/01/2018

 

D.M.

1991

Aleksandr Vladimirovich VINOGRADOV

Kostroma

IK-1 Kostroma

 

31/08/2016 - 30/01/2018

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law

20,000

34.    

10168/18

12/02/2018

 

D.S.

1993

Aleksandr Vladimirovich VINOGRADOV

Kostroma

IK-2 Kostroma Region

 

16/09/2016 - 15/09/2017

 

 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law

20,000

35.    

10174/18

12/02/2018

 

D.S.

1979

Aleksandr Vladimirovich VINOGRADOV

Kostroma

IK-1 Kostroma

 

11/02/2016 - 09/02/2018

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law

20,000

36.    

11538/18

24/01/2018

 

D.P.

1972

Yekaterina Viktorovna YEFREMOVA

Moscow

IK-5 Krasnoyarsk Region

 

01/07/2016 - 27/09/2017

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law

20,000

37.    

13569/18

31/01/2018

 

S.S.

1981

Oksana Vladimirovna PREOBRAZHENSKAYA

Strasbourg

IK-5 Krasnoyarsk Region

 

2014 - at least until the date of introduction

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law

20,000

38.    

8587/19

21/01/2019

 

G.B.

1986

 

 

IK-41 Kemerovo Region

 

24/05/2017 - 24/11/2018

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law

20,000

39.    

9293/19

10/01/2019

 

Y.P.

1980

 

 

IK-41 Kemerovo Region

 

20/02/2018 - 19/11/2018

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law

20,000

 

 



[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2024/854.html