BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Court of Justice of the European Communities (including Court of First Instance Decisions)
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Court of Justice of the European Communities (including Court of First Instance Decisions) >> JeaC-Jacques Charles Geist v Commission of the European Communities. [1981] EUECJ C-192/80 (21 May 1981)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/EUECJ/1981/C19280.html
Cite as: [1981] EUECJ C-192/80

[New search] [Help]

IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE - The source of this judgment is the web site of the Court of Justice of the European Communities. The information in this database has been provided free of charge and is subject to a Court of Justice of the European Communities disclaimer and a copyright notice. This electronic version is not authentic and is subject to amendment.
   

61980O0192
Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 21 May 1981.
Jean-Jacques Charles Geist v Commission of the European Communities.
Case 192/80.
European Court reports 1981 Page 01387

 
   





IN CASE 192/80
JEAN-JACQUES CHARLES GEIST
V
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES


ACCORDING TO THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE 91 ( 3 ) OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE UNLESS THE COURT DECIDES OTHERWISE THE REMAINDER OF THE PROCEEDINGS IN RELATION TO AN OBJECTION IS TO BE ORAL . THE COURT TAKES THE VIEW THAT THERE IS NO NEED TO OPEN THE ORAL PROCEDURE AND DECIDES , PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 91 ( 3 ), TO DEAL WITH THE APPLICATION WITHOUT DELAY ON THE BASIS OF THE WRITTEN DOCUMENTS .

ALTHOUGH THERE IS A SLIP OF THE PEN IN PARAGRAPH 46 OF THE JUDGMENT IN CASE 61/76 IT APPEARS CLEARLY BOTH FROM PARAGRAPH 17 AND FROM THE OPERATIVE PART OF THE JUDGMENT THAT THE COURT INCLUDED THE PERIODIC REPORT FOR 1973 TO 1975 IN THE LIST OF REPORTS WHICH THE APPLICANT WAS SEEKING TO HAVE DRAWN UP AND THAT THE DAMAGES FIXED AT BFR 10 000 WERE CALCULATED FOR THE FAILURE TO DRAW UP ALL THE PERIODIC REPORTS , INCLUDING THE ONE IN QUESTION IN THESE PROCEEDINGS .

THE APPLICATION IS INADMISSIBLE .


ON THOSE GROUNDS
THE COURT ( FIRST CHAMBER )
HEREBY ORDERS AS FOLLOWS :
1 . THE APPLICATION IS DISMISSED AS INADMISSIBLE .

2 . THE PARTIES SHALL BEAR THEIR OWN COSTS .

  
  © European Communities, 2001 All rights reserved

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/EUECJ/1981/C19280.html