BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions >> Kuwait Airways Corporation v Iraqi Airways Company [2001] EWCA Civ 1496 (4 October 2001)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2001/1496.html
Cite as: [2001] EWCA Civ 1496

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


Neutral Citation Number: [2001] EWCA Civ 1496
A3/2001/1218

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE
COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION
COMMERCIAL COURT
(MR JUSTICE LANGLEY)

Royal Courts of Justice
The Strand
London
Thursday 4 October 2001

B e f o r e :

LORD JUSTICE SCHIEMANN
and
LORD JUSTICE WALLER

____________________

KUWAIT AIRWAYS CORPORATION Respondent/Claimant
- v -
IRAQI AIRWAYS COMPANY Applicant/Defendant

____________________

(Computer Aided Transcription by
Smith Bernal, 190 Fleet Street, London EC4A 2HD
Telephone 020 7421 4040
Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)

____________________

MR STEPHEN NATHAN QC (instructed by Messrs Landau & Scanlan, London W1K 2LS) appeared on behalf of THE APPLICANT
____________________

HTML VERSION OF JUDGMENT
____________________

Crown Copyright ©

    Thursday 4 October 2001

  1. LORD JUSTICE SCHIEMANN: I will ask Lord Justice Waller to give a short judgment.
  2. LORD JUSTICE WALLER: As my Lord has indicated, having read the judgment and having read the skeleton put in by Mr Nathan, we think it appropriate to grant permission to appeal. That should not be taken by the appellants as encouraging a great degree of optimism for their chances. But so far as the abandonment point is concerned, it seems to us that that should be considered by the full court. If the point were successful that would then give rise to a limitation point. Since those points are going to the Court of Appeal, it is right that the whole matter should go.
  3. There are very substantial sums of money involved in litigation of this sort and it is in those circumstances that we think it is right that the matter should be considered by the full court.
  4. ORDER: Permission granted; costs to be reserved; case to be relisted if possible in the period February to April, before three judges (one with commercial experience) with an estimate of half a day's pre-reading and one day's listing.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2001/1496.html