BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions >> Pressland v MacLachlan [2001] EWCA Civ 44 (22 January 2001)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2001/44.html
Cite as: [2001] EWCA Civ 44

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


Neutral Citation Number: [2001] EWCA Civ 44
FD/00D10256/2000

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM THE PRINCIPAL REGISTRY,
FAMILY DIVISION
(MISS RECORDER BALL QC)

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand,
London WC2

Monday, 22nd January 2001

B e f o r e :

THE PRESIDENT OF THE FAMILY DIVISION
THE RT HON DAME ELIZABETH BUTLER-SLOSS DBE

____________________

PAUL IAN HAMILTON PRESSLAND Appellant
v
AMANDA KAREN MACLACHLAN Respondent

____________________

Computer-aided Transcript of the Stenograph Notes
of Smith Bernal Reporting Limited
190 Fleet Street, London EC4A 2HD
Telephone No: 0207-421 4040/0207-404 1400
Fax No: 0207-831 8838
(Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)

____________________

MR P J MARSHALL (instructed by Farrer & Co, 66 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London, WC2A 3LH) appeared for the appellant
MR T AMOS (instructed by Manches, Aldwych House, 81 Aldwych, London, WC2B 4RP) appeared for the respondent

____________________

HTML VERSION OF JUDGMENT
____________________

Crown Copyright ©

  1. THE PRESIDENT: I give permission to appeal and order utmost expedition. Time estimate of one hour. I will just stay the contact other than at the contact centre hearing the appeal.
  2. My reason for giving permission to appeal is that it is, in my view, arguable that HHJ Anwyl, having come to the conclusion in October that there could be contact only under independent supervision at a contact centre especially arranged for supervised contact, and that the recorder, Recorder Ball, not only changed the contact over Christmas, because there was to be no contact otherwise since the contact centre was closed, but has continued that contact with the uncle and aunt to run until the end of February.
  3. Whether the contact was right or not over Christmas is water under the bridge, but whether it should continue is a question of how important the risk is in the light of the mother's possible prosecution for attempted murder of the child.
  4. We will try and fit this in for next week at 10am.
  5. ORDER: Permission to appeal granted. Order for utmost expedition. Costs in the appeal.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2001/44.html