BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[New search]
[Printable RTF version]
[Help]
H Williams Tallaght Ltd/Town and County Investments plc [1993] IECA 152 (3rd December, 1993)
Notification
No. CA/256/92E - H.Williams (Tallaght) Ltd /Town and County Investments plc
Decision
No. 152
Introduction
1. Notification
was made by Town and County Investments plc on 30 September, 1992 with a
request for a certificate under
Section 4(4) of the
Competition Act 1991 or, in
the event of a refusal by the Competition Authority to issue a certificate, a
licence under
Section 4(2), in respect of a transfer agreement between
H.Williams (Tallaght) Ltd and Town and County Investments plc in relation to
premises at Ballybrack Shopping Centre, Ballybrack, Co. Dublin.
The
Facts
(a) The
subject of the notification
2. The
notification concerns covenants in the transfer agreement relating to the sale
of shop units at Ballybrack Shopping Centre, Ballybrack, Co. Dublin by
H.Williams (Tallaght) Ltd as vendor to Mallgate Ltd (now Town and County
Investments plc) as purchaser.
(b) The
parties involved
3. H.Williams
(Tallaght) Ltd was engaged in the business of supermarkets with outlets
throughout the State. Its successor in title, Quinnsworth, is similarly
engaged. Mallgate Ltd and its successor in title in relation to the Ballybrack
Shopping Centre,Town and County Investments plc are engaged in the letting of
commercial property in shopping centres.
(c) The
notified arrangements
4. The
Agreement notified was a sale/transfer agreement relating to shop units at a
number of shopping centres executed on 9 August 1986 between H.Williams
(Tallaght) Ltd as vendor and Mallgate Ltd as purchaser. The agreement provides
for the sale of shop units at the shopping centres, but excluding retained
properties (which means the Supermarket in each centre), subject to a number of
conditions. These conditions include a covenant by the purchaser to comply with
various obligations relating to the shopping centre, covenants by the vendor to
provide central services and the following user clause applicable to the vendor
viz.
clause
5 (d)
"The Vendor further covenants with the Purchaser and its assigns not to permit
the Supermarkets.....on the retained property to be used for any other purpose
other than as Supermarkets."
clause
5 (e)
" The Vendor hereby covenants with the Purchaser and assigns to the effect
that the foregoing covenants will be a burden on the retained property...."
Assessment
- The Applicability of Section 4(1)
5. The
Authority considers that H.Williams (Tallaght) Ltd and Mallgate Ltd were
undertakings at the time the agreement was made and that the notified agreement
was an agreement between undertakings. The agreement has effect within the
State.
6. The
agreement for the sale of the premises predated the coming into force of the
Competition Act and the sale was completed prior to
the Act. In the Authority's
view, the prohibition in
Section 4(1) only applies to a current or continuing
contractual commitment subsequent to the coming into force of
the Act. As the
sale element was completed prior to the commencement of
the Act that aspect of
the arrangements does not come within the scope of
Section 4(1).
7. While
the transfer agreement relates to the sale of units in a number of shopping
centres, the notification relates only to the sale of units at Ballybrack.
Under the restricted user clause 5 as it continues to apply to Ballybrack
Shopping Centre the vendor and its successor in title, Quinnsworth, is
restricted from using the supermarket unit for any purpose other than a
supermarket. The Authority has already decided that the restricted and
exclusive user clauses applying to tenancies of the other shop units at
Ballybrack Shopping Centre do not offend against
Section 4(1) of the
Competition Act, 1991 (vide Decision 90 ) for the reasons given in the Notice
of the Authority of 2 September 1993 (Iris Oifigiuil 10 September 1993, pp.
665-667). The Authority considers that for similar reasons the restricted user
clause relating to the supermarket unit also does not offend against
Section
4(1).
The
Certificate
8. The
Competition Authority has issued the following certificate:
The
Competition Authority certifies that in its opinion, on the basis of the facts
in its possession, the agreement between H.Williams (Tallaght) Ltd (now
Quinnsworth)and Mallgate Ltd (now Town and County Investments plc)for the sale
of a premises at Ballybrack Shopping Centre, Ballybrack, Co. Dublin notified
under
Section 7 on 30 September 1992 (notification no. CA/256/92E), does not
offend against
Section 4(1) of the
Competition Act, 1991.
For
the Competition Authority
Des
Wall
Member
3
December 1993
© 1993 Irish Competition Authority
BAILII:
Copyright Policy |
Disclaimers |
Privacy Policy |
Feedback |
Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/1993/152.html