BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[New search]
[Printable RTF version]
[Help]
Riga Ltd/Tenants at Douglas S. C. [1993] IECA 59 (5th October, 1993)
COMPETITION
AUTHORITY
Competition
Authority Decision of 5 October 1993 relating to a proceeding under Section 4
of the Competition Act, l99l.
Notification
No: CA/223/92E - Riga Ltd/Tenants at Douglas Shopping Centre.
Decision
No: 59
Price
£0.30
£0.70 incl. postage.
Notification
No. CA/223/92E - Riga Ltd/Tenants at Douglas Shopping Centre
Decision
No. 59
Introduction
1. Notification
was made by Riga Ltd on 30 September 1992 with a request for a certificate
under
Section 4(4) of the
Competition Act, 1991, or in the event of refusal by
the Competition Authority to issue a certificate, a licence under
Section 4(2)
in respect of standard leases between Riga Ltd and tenants at Douglas Shopping
Centre, Douglas, Co. Cork.
The
Facts
(a) The
subject of the notification
2. The
notification concerns the leases of shop units at Douglas Shopping Centre,
Douglas, Co. Cork between Riga Ltd as landlord and 30 separate tenants of the
units.
(b)
The parties involved
3. Riga
Ltd is engaged in the business of letting shop units at Douglas Shopping
Centre. The tenants are engaged in various trading activities at the shopping
centre.
(c) The
notified arrangements
4. The
standard shopping centre leases fall into 3 categories with the following
restricted user clauses viz.
I. Leases
executed prior to March 1991
(a) Under
clause 2(18)(a) the tenant covenants "Not to use or permit the demised premises
or any part thereof to be used for any purpose other than
"
(b) Under
clause 2(20)(a) the tenant covenants "Not to assign underlet or part with
possession....of the demised premises or any part thereof...."
II.
Leases Executed since March 1991
(a) Under
clause 4.22 the tenant covenants "Not without the prior consent in writing of
the landlord ......to use or permit ..... the demised premises or any part or
parts thereof to be used for any purpose other than as set forth in Part II of
the First Schedule hereto......
(b) Under
clause 4.23.2 the tenant covenants "Not at any time to use the demised premises
or any part thereof ..... as a butcher shop, or a greengrocers shop, or as a
Building Society or Bank or for the sale food......"
(c) Under
clause 4.21 the tenant covenants "Not to assign transfer or underlet or part
with .. the possession or occupation of the Demised premises or any part
thereof..... BUT SO THAT NOTWITHSTANDING the Landlord shall not
unreasonably withold its consent......"
III
Supplemental leases for certain of the older lettings
Under
clauses 21, 22 and 23.2 of the Sixth Schedule to the standard supplemental
lease the tenant provides covenants similar to those at II (c), (a) and (b)
above.
Riga
Ltd have supplied details of the permitted user applicable to each of the 30
tenancies. In addition they have also indicated that certain exclusivity of use
to tenants has been provided for by way of separate covenants or side letters.
These include a covenant by the lessor (to a supermarket) not to allow any
other unit operate for the sale of foodstuffs or groceries save where the area
does not exceed 1500 square feet and a side letter committing the landlord to
best endeavours not to permit tenants of areas of the shopping centre to
operate as a chemist shop.
In
addition, there are a number of other standard restrictive covenants and
obligations in the standard leases notified.
Assessment
- The applicability of Section 4 (1)
5. The
Authority considers that Riga Ltd and the tenants are undertakings and that the
notified leases are agreements between undertakings. The agreements have effect
within the State.
6. The
Authority considers that the notified standard agreements, and their restricted
and exclusive user clauses and the other restrictive clauses and obligations,
do not have the object or effect of preventing, restricting or distorting
competition in trade in any goods or services in the State or in any part of
the State, for the reasons given in the Notice of the Authority of 2 September
1993 in respect of shopping centre leases (Iris Oifigiuil 10 September 1993,
pp. 665-667). The Authority therefore considers that the notified agreements
between Riga Ltd and the tenants do not offend against
Section 4 (1) of the
Competition Act 1991.
The
Certificate
7. The
Competition Authority has issued the following certificate.
The
Competition Authority certifies that in its opinion, on the basis of the facts
in its possession, the agreements between Riga Ltd and the tenants in relation
to the leases of shop units at Douglas Shopping Centre, Douglas, Co. Cork
notified under
Section 7 on 30 September 1992 (notification no. CA/223/92E), do
not offend against
Section 4 (1) of the
Competition Act, 1991.
For
the Competition Authority
Des
Wall
Member
5
October 1993
© 1993 Irish Competition Authority
BAILII:
Copyright Policy |
Disclaimers |
Privacy Policy |
Feedback |
Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/1993/59.html