BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[New search]
[Printable RTF version]
[Help]
Adidas / Sports Stars [1995] IECA 422 (12th September, 1995)
Competition
Authority decision of 12 September, 1995 relating to a proceeding under Section
4 of the Competition Act, 1991.
Notification
no. CA/426/92E - Adidas/Sports Stars.
Decision
no. 422
Introduction
1. This
decision concerns a standard sponsorship agreement between Adidas (Ireland)
Limited (Adidas) and individual sports personalities which was notified to the
Authority on 30 September, 1992. The notification requested a certificate
under
Section 4(4) of the
Competition Act, 1991 or, in the event of a refusal
by the Competition Authority to grant a certificate, a licence under
Section 4
(2).
The
Facts
(a)
The Subject of the Notification
2. The
notification concerns a standard sponsorship agreement between Adidas and
well-known individual sports personalities. Under the terms of the agreement
Adidas makes various payments to the other party over a period of time and has
an exclusive right to provide them with all their footwear and clothing
requirements for their sporting activities free of charge. In return Adidas
have the right to use photographs in Adidas kit, of the individual for
advertising purposes. The duration of the agreements may vary.
(b)
The Parties involved
3. Adidas
is engaged in the production and marketing of sports goods including
equipment, clothing and footwear. It is a subsidiary of Adidas AG. The other
parties to the arrangements are well-known individual sports personalities.
(c)
The Products and the Market
4. The
products involved are sportswear including equipment, clothing and footwear.
The relevant market is the market for those products. There are a number of
suppliers of such products, most of them located outside the State, which would
have similar arrangements with other individuals. Adidas estimated that there
are many hundreds of buyers of such products at retail level within the State.
They estimated that the total market turnover was [ ].
(d)
The Arrangements
5. The
arrangements involve Adidas sponsoring the individuals concerned in return for
the use of their photographs in advertising materials. Specifically Adidas
agrees to pay the individual a specified sum in quarterly instalments for the
duration of the agreement. In addition Adidas agrees to supply footwear and
clothing which is necessary for the pursuit of the individual's sports career.
Under clause 5 both parties agree not to disclose details of the agreement at
any time in any manner which might injure or cause loss, whether directly or
indirectly, to either party. In return Adidas require the use of the
individual's photograph for advertising purposes in Irish magazines. They also
require photographs of the individual wearing the Adidas kit for circulation to
the Irish sports trade. The individual is also required to keep the footwear
clean and to display the three stripes ( Adidas trademark) prominently when
playing. The individual may also be required to make personal apearances at
major Irish stores for a minimum guaranteed fee. The duration of the
agreements varies between one and five years.
(e)
Submissions by the Parties
6. Adidas
advanced a number of arguments in support of their request for a certificate.
They claimed, for example, that the agreement did not so much prevent, restrict
or distort competition as facilitate the 'establishment of more successful "
sports stars" this increasing the number of buyers in the relevant market'.
They stated that there were a high number of competitors in both the supply and
the demand market and this number would not be significantly reduced as a
result of the agreement. In addition Adidas claimed that the agreement allowed
for the creation and maintenance of competitors in the market as it did not
restrict sports federations or sportsmen from using other sponsors. They also
claimed that the individual sports people may not be undertakings. They argued
that, for exmple, amateur sports stars cannot be described as being engaged for
gain while professional soccer players may still only be employees. A number
of arguments were also advanced in support of the request for a licence but
these are not considered here.
Assessment
(a)
Section 4 (1)
7.
Section
4 (1) of the
Competition Act, 1991, prohibits and renders void all agreements
between undertakings which have as their object or effect the prevention,
restriction or distortion of competition in trade in any goods or services in
the State or in any part of the State.
(b)
The Undertakings and the Agreement
8.
Section
3 (1) of the
Competition Act defines an undertaking as ´a person being an
individual, a body corporate or an unincorporated body of persons engaged for
gain in the production, supply or distribution of goods or the provision of a
service.' Adidas is engaged for gain in the production and distribution of
sportswear and is therefore an undertaking. Adidas have argued that the
individual sports people who are parties to the agreement may not be
undertakings. The Authority sees little merit in this argument. By virtue of
this agreement the individuals receive payments from Adidas in return for
participating in the promotion of its products. Regardless of the individual's
status as a sports personality, the Authority regards such activity as the
provision of services for gain, and they are therefore undertakings. The
notified arrangements constitute an agreement between undertakings. The
relevant geographic market is the State.
(c)
Applicability of Section 4 (1)
9. The
Authority believes that the notified arrangements do not prevent, restrict or
distort competition. They do not prevent any other firm from selling
sportswear in Ireland nor from marketing its sportswear. None of the
provisions in the notified terms and conditions offend against
Section 4 (1).
The
Decision
10. In
the opinion of the Authority Adidas (Ireland) Limited and the individual sports
personalities are undertakings within the meaning of
Section 3(1) of the
Competition Act, and the notified arrangements constituted an agreement between
undertakings. In the Authority's opinion the arrangements did not have, as
their object or effect, the prevention, restriction or distortion of
competition within the State or any part of the State.
The
Certificate
11. The
Competition Authority has issued the following certificate:
The
Competition Authority certifies that, in its opinion, on the basis of the facts
in its possession, the standard sponsorship agreement between Adidas (Ireland)
Limited and the individual sports personalities, (notification no. CA/426/92E),
notified on 30 September 1992, under
Section 7, does not offend against
section
4(1) of the
Competition Act.
For
the Competition Authority
Patrick
Massey
Member
12
September, 1995.
© 1995 Irish Competition Authority
BAILII:
Copyright Policy |
Disclaimers |
Privacy Policy |
Feedback |
Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/1995/422.html