BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
High Court of Ireland Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> High Court of Ireland Decisions >> McDonagh v. Cork County Council [1998] IEHC 2 (12th January, 1998) URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IEHC/1998/2.html Cite as: [1998] IEHC 2 |
[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
1. By
Order dated the 21st March, 1997 Mr. Justice Kelly granted leave to apply for
various Orders of Judicial Review as set out in paragraph (d) of the
Applicant's statement granting the application for Judicial Review. The
Applicants are a married couple who reside with their six children in
Charleville, Co. Cork. They reside in a caravan with their family on the side
of the road and have done so since they married in 1985. They do not want a
halting site in which to put their caravan. They wished to be housed in
permanent housing accommodation. The Respondents deny they have been so long
waiting and that they first appeared on the list as requiring housing in 1991.
However, this is immaterial. Both sides agree that Mr. and Mrs. McDonagh are
living in appalling conditions on the roadside. One of their children was
killed in a motor accident near their caravan and the present conditions are
dismal in the extreme for Mr. and Mrs. McDonagh and their children. They did
apply either in 1985 as they say or in 1991 as the Respondents say for housing.
However, it is clear they are now at the top of the housing list and that they
are undoubtedly the number one priority of the local authority to provide them
with houses. They were supported in this belief by statements made by various
members of the Cork Council and also by various things said by Social Welfare
Officers. In fact they were told to look out for a house and they did so and
identified one but it could not be purchased because it fell outside the county
boundary, therefore, the local authority could not procure it. However, in the
summer of 1996 the Applicants identified a house at No. 47 Harrison Place,
Charleville which suited their needs. They notified the Respondents and the
Respondents proceeded to purchase the premises. Now the McDonaghs believed it
was being purchased for them because of their dire need. The local authority
say no, it was being bought for the purpose of being put into their stock of
housing to deal with the needs of their administrative area. There were told
that they would be in possession of the house by December of last year.
However, when the local authority got possession of the house they discovered
that it needed a lot of electrical work and the Applicants were notified that
the house would not be ready until January. When it became known to the people
living in this private residential area that one of the houses in their estate
was about to be handed over to people they would regard as travellers.
Technically, I do not think this is true. They do not wish to be travellers.
They do not wish to have a halting site. They do not wish to be nomads. They
want to have a house for themselves and their children. However, when the word
got out that the County Council were going to put the McDonaghs into No. 47
Harrison Place, it would be fair to say that all hell was let loose. Numerable
people made application to the County Council and sent letters and newspaper
reports and in his affidavit on behalf of the County Council made by Mr.
Patrick Lane the following was stated and I quote:-
2. They
are not in fact travellers, they intend to be settled but to continue with the
affidavit a petition was signed by 35 members of the house holders. In
addition thereto the Counsel received a number of letters of protest against
the proposed letting of the premises and he refers to a copy of the petition
and copies of the letters which include one from a doctor saying that a lady
who is in ill-health that she was so terrified that her health might further
deteriorate. He proceeds and I quote:-
4. This
case has been very fully and ably argued before me by Ms. Aileen Donnelly on
behalf of the McDonaghs and Mr. Patrick Butler on behalf of the Cork County
Council. They have put many interesting positions before me. Indeed I
considered reserving my judgment but towards the end of it I clearly decided
that I could deal with it on the submissions offered by Counsel on both sides.
5. Firstly,
I think that Mr. Lane understandably but inaccurately stated the reasons for
refusing to give this house to the McDonaghs. There is no doubt that the
McDonaghs believed they were going to get this house. They chose it by the
request of the local authority. The local authority bought it and intended to
give it to them. In a letter of the 7th February, 1997, Mr. Lane who is an
administrative officer with the Cork County Council writes to Mr. Peter Wise
who is Solicitor of the Law Centre in Cork in relation to Mr. and Mrs. McDonagh
that part of it reads as follows:-
6. Unfortunately,
probably everyone in the country of the settled community belong to the
organisation known as NIMBYS (Not in My Back Yard). Everyone agrees that
people should not in this day and age be left in caravans or old fashioned
tents on the edge of the roadside. Everyone agrees and it is the law that they
must be housed. Section 13 of the 1988 Act provides for the provision of
halting sites for people of this nature whose desires are basically nomadic.
However, in all the cases there have been local complaints. These are
perfectly understandable. They feel that settled itinerants beside them will
create dirt, may increase the crime in the area and will probably diminish the
value of the house which they may have devoted a lifetime to buying for
themselves and their heirs. There have in fact been cases where halting sites
have been imposed against the will of the local community and in one case at
least a County Manager was picketed and retired prematurely. The reaction of
the public is understandable. However, these people are Irish people also. We
treasure all our people equally. They must get the same but no more than there
fellow citizens. Mr. and Mrs. McDonagh are not looking for a halting site.
They are, like any other citizen, entitled to apply for a house. The local
authority accepts that they are living in appalling conditions and that they
have priority and are number one on the priority list. However, it is quite
clear in this case that while there was possibly an expectation that they would
get the house which they had chosen themselves, there is nothing in writing or
anything sealed by the County Manager which would entitle them to specific
performance. This Court cannot order the local authority how to exercise its
respective powers and direct for a certain person to be allocated a certain
house in the absence of a specific contract. However, what happened in a
number of cases and in particular the
Meath
County Council
case declarations were given by my colleague, Mr. Justice Flood, which was
followed by the President of the High Court in
O'Brien
-v- The Wicklow UDC
- Judgment delivered on the 10th June, 1994 and more recently in
Ward
-v- South County Dublin County Council
,
my colleague Ms. Justice Laffoy on the 31st July, 1996. The County Council
must not take into consideration threats of violence or any form of
intimidation. They had a statutory duty to provide for the housing needs of
all those qualified. In this case there is no doubt that Mr. and Mrs. McDonagh
qualify. It is therefore the duty of the local authority to provide housing
for this unfortunate family. However, it is not for this Court in the absence
of an enforceable contract to direct that they must provide them with No. 47
Harrison Place. The Court directs that they must be housed before the 25th
December. It is up to the local authority to implement that on whatever stock
of housing presently available or becomes available by that date. I will not
conclude this case but will adjourn it to the 1st day of next term to ensure
that this Order be carried out.
7. On
resumption on the 12th January, 1998 the Court was delighted to learn that the
McDonagh family have been provided with suitable accommodation and are well
settled. The Court congratulates the County Manager and local authority on
this result. The Court awards costs to the applicants who are on legal aid.