BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Jersey Unreported Judgments |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Unreported Judgments >> AG v JE and JB [2007] JRC 177 (24 September 2007) URL: http://www.bailii.org/je/cases/UR/2007/2007_177.html Cite as: [2007] JRC 177 |
||
[New search] [Help]
[2007]JRC177
ROYAL COURT
(Samedi Division)
24th September 2007
|
Before : |
M. C. St. J. Birt, Esq., Deputy Bailiff, and Jurats Bullen and Clapham. |
The Attorney General
-v-
J. E.
J. B.
J. E.
Application by the Crown, seeking, in respect of the accused and made pursuant to Article 9(2) of the Criminal Justice (Young Offenders)(Jersey) Law, 1994, an order for the person's parents or guardian to give security for the person's good behaviour, following sentencing on charges of:
|
1 count of: |
Affray. (Count 1). |
|
1 count of: |
Grave and criminal assault. (Count 2). |
|
1 count of: |
Violently resisting arrest. (Count 3). |
Age: 17 (16 at the time of the offence).
Plea: Guilty.
J. B.
Application by the Crown, seeking, in respect of the accused and made pursuant to Article 9(2) of the Criminal Justice (Young Offenders)(Jersey) Law, 1994, an order for the person's parents or guardian to give security for the person's good behaviour, following sentencing a on charge of:
|
1 count of: |
Affray. (Count 1). |
Age: 17 (16 at the time of the offence).
Plea: Guilty.
C. M. M. Yates, Esq., Crown Advocate.
Advocate M. L. Preston for J. E.
Advocate D. J. Hopwood for J. B.
JUDGMENT
THE DEPUTY BAILIFF:
1. Both parents in this case have been very supportive of their sons. Nevertheless the fact remains that when the boys were 16 they were out quite late, drinking to excess and committing the very serious offence that they did on this occasion. As we said at the time they were both lucky not to serve periods of youth detention. It is important that parents should take responsibility for their children and do their best to ensure that they do not drink to excess and go out and get into trouble.
2. In the circumstances we think it is right to make an order on this occasion under Article 9 of the Criminal Justice (Young Offenders)(Jersey) Law 1994, and we note that both parents have accepted this. We also hope very much that the two defendants realise that they have put their parents in a difficult position by their actions and that they will take note of this and try not to get into trouble in the future.
3. We are going to make the order suggested. In the case of Mr and Mrs B that is £1,000 until JB's 18th birthday. In the case of JE that is £500, again until his 18th birthday. The sums must be paid to the Viscount within 7 days.
