BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Industrial Tribunals Northern Ireland Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Industrial Tribunals Northern Ireland Decisions >> Redfern v KPMG & Anor [2006] NIIT 365_05 (5 July 2006)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/nie/cases/NIIT/2006/365_05.html
Cite as: [2006] NIIT 365_5, [2006] NIIT 365_05

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]



     
    THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALS

    CASE REF: 365/05

    CLAIMANT: Adam Redfern

    RESPONDENTS: 1. KPMG

    2. Shop Electric Limited (In Liquidation)

    DECISION ON A PRE-HEARING REVIEW

    The decision of the tribunal is that the claim has not been presented within the time-limit set out in Article 217(5) of the Employment Rights (Northern Ireland) Order 1996, and the claim is dismissed.

    Constitution of Tribunal:

    Chairman: Mr P. Buggy (sitting alone)

    Appearances:

    The claimant was not present or represented.

    The respondent was represented by Mr P Martin of Arthur Cox, Solicitors.

    REASONS

  1. The reasons for this decision were given orally at the conclusion of the hearing.
  2. The claimant was duly notified of the date of this hearing. He was not in attendance and was not represented at the hearing. In the circumstances, I decided to dispose of the proceedings in the absence of the claimant. Prior to doing so, I considered the contents of the claimant's originating application, the contents of the Notice of Appearance which has been entered in this case, a KPMG report dated 27 January 2005, and a copy of a letter dated 19 April 2006 (which Mr Martin had sent to the claimant).
  3. In the letter of 19 April, Mr Martin notified the claimant that he had instructions to apply for an order for costs against the claimant in certain circumstances. However, he has informed me, at this hearing, that no application for costs is being pursued.
  4. Chairman:

    Date and place of hearing: 5 July 2006, Belfast.

    Date decision recorded in register and issued to parties:


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/nie/cases/NIIT/2006/365_05.html