BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Industrial Tribunals Northern Ireland Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Industrial Tribunals Northern Ireland Decisions >> Ware v Northern Regional College [2013] NIIT 02220_11IT (07 March 2013) URL: http://www.bailii.org/nie/cases/NIIT/2013/2220_11IT.html Cite as: [2013] NIIT 02220_11IT, [2013] NIIT 2220_11IT |
||
[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALS
CASE REF: 2220/11
CLAIMANT: James Ware
RESPONDENT: Northern Regional College
DECISION ON AN APPLICATION FOR A REVIEW
The unanimous decision of the tribunal is that the claimant is refused his application for a review of the tribunal’s decision.
Constitution of Tribunal:
Chairman: Mr B Greene
Members: Mr P Killen
Mrs S Butcher
Appearances:
The claimant appeared in person.
The respondent was represented by Mr Neil Richards, of counsel, instructed by Worthingtons Solicitors.
1. On 8, 9, 11 and 14 May 2012 and 29 August 2012 at Belfast, an application for equal pay, sex discrimination, breach of contract, unlawful deduction of wages and less favourable treatment on the basis of fixed-term working status were heard.
2. The tribunal dismissed all the applicant’s claims.
3. The tribunal’s decision was issued on 4 October 2012.
4. The claimant sought a review of the tribunal’s decision under Regulation 34(3)(d) and (e) of the Industrial Tribunals (Constitution Rules of Procedure) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2005.
5. The claimant’s application for a review of the tribunal’s decision was listed for 1 March 2013 and if his application for a review were successful that the review would be conducted thereafter.
6. Prior to the review hearing, both the claimant and the respondent had submitted written submissions on their respective positions on the review application.
7. The tribunal was not satisfied that the claimant had established a ground that would justify it reviewing its decision and his application for a review was dismissed on 1 March 2013.
8. Oral reasons were given at the hearing.
Chairman:
Date and place of hearing: 1 March 2013, Belfast.
Date decision issued to parties:
