BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Johnston v Johnston. [1579] Mor 4788 (7 March 1579)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1579/Mor1204788-004.html
Cite as: [1579] Mor 4788

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1579] Mor 4788      

Subject_1 FORUM COMPETENS.
Subject_2 DIVISION. II.

Forum Competens Ratione Domicilii.

Johnston
v.
Johnston

Date: 7 March 1579
Case No. No 4.

The pursuer and defender being in the same jurisdiction, action may proceed before their own judge, though the thing in question be within another jurisdiction.


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

There was ane supplication given in be one Johnston, burgess of Edinburgh, that where he was persewit be another Johnston burgess in the samen, before the Provost and Bailies of the said burgh, to flit and remove frae certain field land not in the jurisdiction of the said Provost and Bailies, therefore desyrit the matter to be advocatit. It was reasonit be the Lords, that in respect they were both burgesses, et quod actor sequebatur forum rei, there should no advocation be grantit, because the parties were not prejudgit when everie ane of them was convenit before their awne Judge competent. To this was answerit, That albeit the parties were both of one jurisdiction, yet the lands lay not in the same jurisdiction whereof the parties were, et sic ratione rei de qua agitur the action aught to be persewit before the Judge in whose jurisdiction the lands lie, prout in cap. licet extra de foro competenti, et multo clarius et specialius, C. 3. Tit. 19. in L. ultima, ubi in rem actio exerceri debet. The Lords would not grant advocation, and ordainit the parties to use their defences, and fand that the Provost and Bailies might be Judges competent in such causes.

Fol. Dic. v. 1. p. 326. Colvil, MS. p. 280.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1579/Mor1204788-004.html