BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Thomson v Thomson's Executors. [1600] Mor 9864 (00 January 1600)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1600/Mor2309864-190.html Cite as:
[1600] Mor 9864
Vitious Intromission Purged by Confirmation, or by declarator of escheat.
Thomson v. Thomson's Executors
Case No. No 190.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Confirmation of the defunct's moveables, before process is commenced at the creditor's instance for vitious intromission, purges the vitiosity whoever be the executor. The administration of moveables, after the death of the proprietor, belongs to the church; and when one is decerned executor by the Commissary, it is the same as naming him trustee for the in gathering the defunct's moveables, which of consequence he has right to claim from every person upon using the form of a confirmation; the vitious intromitter then becomes accountable to him, and regularly to him only, which of course must purge the vitious intromission, because, from the nature of his office, he can insist no further than for compt and reckoning. And though, even after confirmation, action is sometimes sustained to creditors against those who intromit with subjects left out of the inventory of the confirmed testament, which in strict law is competent to the executor only; yet that is no more but a favourable extension for the case of creditors who have once commenced a process upon vitious intromission, not knowing that there has been an executor appointed, to save the circuit of a new process against the executor, or a confirmation ad omissa; and by the common rules of law an extraordinary remedy can go no farther than the ordinary remedy, in place of which it is substituted. Thus, in a pursuit upon the passive title vitious intromission, it was sustained as a defence, That decreet was already recovered by the executor against the defender for her intromissions.
Fol. Dic. v. 2. p. 44.*** Kerse reports the case alluded to.
In an action pursued by John Thomson in Leith contra The Executors of James Thomson there, it was alleged for Bessie Bell, relict, That she could not be convened as universal intromissatrix, because there was an executor decerned, who, by virtue thereof, had obtained sentence against the relict for one half, and for the other half she has found caution to make the same forthcoming. The Lords found the exception relevant.
