BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Bell v Hoc. [1610] Mor 13983 (31 May 1610)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1610/Mor3213983-067.html Cite as:
[1610] Mor 13983
Whether one is liable for the malversation of those under his authority? - Complaint raised in name of another without his authority.
Bell v. Hoc
Date: 31 May 1610 Case No. No 67.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
A wife being acted in the books of the session to abstain from the company of a slanderous man, under a pecunial pain, albeit her husband have consented to the act, she being thereafter decerned by that session to have contravened that act, and being charged for the penalty, the same will not have execution against the executors of her deceased husband, because it is not thought reasonable, that the husband's goods shall be evicted for the penalty of an injury done by his-wife to himself.
