BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Monteith v Carmichael. [1614] Mor 2721 (21 December 1614) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1614/Mor0702721-042.html Cite as: [1614] Mor 2721 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1614] Mor 2721
Subject_1 COMPETENT.
Subject_2 SECT. X. Improbation how Proponable.
Date: Monteith
v.
Carmichael
21 December 1614
Case No.No 42.
The Lords refused to hear a party propone improbation of a decree-arbitral by way of suspension, though he offered to improve it by the oaths of the Judges, who were both present.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In an action betwixt Robert Monteith and William Carmichael, the Lords sustained a decreet-arbitral, which was pronounced in ipso termino upon the day betwixt and the which the decreet should have been pronounced; and, in the same cause, the Lords would not hear the said Robert Monteith to improve, by way of suspension, albeit he offered to improve the same by the oaths of the Judges, who were both present.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting