BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> A. v B. [1617] Mor 662 (7 January 1617)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1617/Mor0200662-064.html
Cite as: [1617] Mor 662

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1617] Mor 662      

Subject_1 ARBITRATION.
Subject_2 Reduction of Decree-Arbitral.

A
v.
B

Date: 7 January 1617
Case No. No 64.

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

The Lords founds submission null, because it was subscribed only by one notar, it being about the heritable right of an acre of land; and, when the truth was referred to the parties oath, the Lords would not take the oath of the cedent in prejudice of the assigney. Item, The Lords, in the same cause, found a decreet null for three causes, conjunctim, 1mo, Because some of the submitters had not subscribed. 2do, Because one of the Judges had not subscribed the submission, and yet had subscribed the decreet. 3tio, That the decreet bore not that the Judges had received the parties claims.

Kerse, MS.(Arbiters.) fol. 181.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1617/Mor0200662-064.html