BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Dickson v Earl of Galloway. [1624] Mor 8373 (3 July 1624)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1624/Mor2008373-065.html
Cite as: [1624] Mor 8373

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1624] Mor 8373      

Subject_1 LITIGIOUS.
Subject_2 DIVISION III.

Litigious by Denunciation on a Horning.
Subject_3 SECTION. V.

Act 147th, Parliament 1592, regarding Escheats.

Dickson
v.
Earl of Galloway

Date: 3 July 1624
Case No. No 65.

Found in conformity with Cunningham against Laird of Buchanan, No 63. p. 8372.


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

Robert Dickson, donatar to the escheat and liferent of Hannah Mure of Arionland, pursued ane special declarator of the rebel's liferent against the Earl of Galloway, alleged possessor of the lands and teinds pertaining to the rebel, be the space of many years. In the cause the Lords fand,

That he who is year and day at the horn, his liferent falls presently to his superior.

That a man being year and day at the horn, not entering to his predecessor's lands, hinders not thereby the superior to have the benefit of his liferent, as gif he was infeft.

Ane tack appointed to be given after the expiring of ane preceding tack, has not ane certain entry, unless the new tack either make mention of the term of the first tack, or that the first tack be produced.

Ane tack is valid, albeit the entry be appointed to be many years before the date.

The defender excepting upon ane tack of lands and teinds, and many years in possession be virtue thereof, albeit the pursuer reply upon ane tack long anterior, and yet not expired and continual possession be virtue thereof, and content that he should he preferred being in libello; nevertheless in respect of the great soume he paid very many years, the Lords admitted the exception for byganes, but prejudice of the pursuer's tack in time coming, as accords of the law.

Fol. Dic. v. 1. p. 557. Haddington, MS. v. 2. fol. 243.

*** See Muir and Ahannay against Earl of Galloway, No 33. p. 3638, voce Escheat.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1624/Mor2008373-065.html