BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Wallace v Tenants. [1626] Mor 13588 (18 July 1626) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1626/Mor3213788-012.html Cite as: [1626] Mor 13588 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1626] Mor 13588
Subject_1 REMOVING.
Subject_2 SECT. I. Who entitled to pursue a Removing.
Date: Wallace
v.
Tenants
18 July 1626
Case No.No 12.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In a removing, at the instance of Wallace contra Tenants of, the Lords would not sustain the pursuit, upon a sasine produced by the pursuer for his title, which was of a date posterior to the warning, albeit the pursuer alleged, That the sasine proceeded upon the superior's precept of clare constat given to him, as heir to his father, which precept preceded the warning, and so that the sasine should be drawn back to the precept; which was not sustained by the Lords, as if the sasine had proceeded upon a retour, in which case it is usual to draw back the sasine to the retour, but not to a precept of clare constat.
Act. Cunninghame. Alt. Millar. Clerk, Scot.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting