BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> The Laird of Clackmannan v The Laird of Bonymoon, and Findowrie. [1627] 1 Brn 374 (16 November 1627) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1627/Brn010374-1000.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR GEORGE AUCHINLECK OF BALMANNO.
Subject_2 The following CASE, and those in the preceding pages, marked as taken from 2d MS. are not found in the MS. followed by Mr Morison, while printing in his Dictionary the Cases from Auchinleck referred to in the Folio Dictionary by Lord Kames.
Date: The Laird of Clackmannan
v.
The Laird of Bonymoon, and Findowrie
16 November 1627 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The Laird of Clackmannan, being infeft in an annualrent of £600, furth of the barony of Bonymoon, or any part thereof, in October 1624, to be holden of the Laird of Bonymoon, and his heirs, which infeftment is confirmed by the king in anno 1625; he receives payment of a term's annualrent after his infeftment, and raises summons, in March 1627, against the Laird of Bonymoon and the tenants, to hear and see letters directed for poinding of the ground. Compears Findowrie, alleging him to be infeft in one of the roums in January 1625, and, by virtue of his infeftment, had apprehended possession, by the space of year and day, before Clackmannan's citation: in respect whereof, and by reason of the Act of Parliament, King James V, Parl. 7, cap. 105, he ought to be preferred, notwithstanding that Clackmannan's right was prior, and confirmed. The Lords found Findowrie's exception relevant, in respect of his infeftment clad with a year's possession.
2d MS. Page 188.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting