BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Earl of Cassillis v Earl of Wigton. [1629] Mor 14423 (22 July 1629)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1629/Mor3314423-011.html Cite as:
[1629] Mor 14423
Tenor of the Brieve. - Form of proceeding. - Reduction of Service. - Can a Service be stopped by an offer to prove a nearer Heir?
Earl of Cassillis v. Earl of Wigton
Date: 22 July 1629 Case No. No. 11.
Unnecessary to specify the particular king at whose faith the party died.
Intermediate descents must be particularized.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In a supplication for assessors to a service of the Earl of Cassillis, the Lords being consulted by the assessors in these points, which were controverted betwixt the parties, they declared and advised as follows: viz. In a general service of the Earl of Cassillis' fore-grand-sir's grand-sir; they found, that the assessors might serve, and the judge also put it to the trial of an inquest, the parties claim bearing, that the predecessor to whom he desired to be served general heir died at the faith of King James III. or of some of his successors, kings reigning for the time; which claim the Lords thought to be relevant, albeit the same bore not specifice, in which king's time that predecessor died precisely, which was not proveable in facto tam antiquo, neither necessary to be precisely proven, but was enough that it should be tried, that he died at the faith of the king reigning. Item, They found, that the party desiring to be served ought to qualify and be special, upon the descent and persons intervening betwixt him and the defunct, to whom he craved to be served; and also, that he ought to instruct and verify the descent, the instruction whereof ought to be made to the assize, and not to the judge, and ought to be produced before the assizers; and also, that the party compearing against the service, ought to see the writs produced, to verify the same, to the effect he may oppone what he may in law, wherefore the same cannot verify the claimer to be heir.
Fol. Dic. v. 2. p. 370, 371. Durie, p. 466.*** Auchinleck also reports this case:
In a service of general heir to one's predecessor, the time of whose death is uncertain, it is sufficient to retour him to have died at the faith and peace of our sovereign lord for the time indefinite.
Questions resolved by the Lords of Session in the service of the Earl of Cassillis, and proponed by the judges and their assessors as general heir to Gilbert Lord Kennedy, his fore-grandfather's grandfather, against which service the Earl of Wigton made opposition. In the said service, it was resolved by the Lords, that the Earl of Cassillis should be special in his claim in reckoning the special descent from the said Gilbert, and verify the same in writ before the judge, and the party who was called for his interest. The Earl of Cassillis contended, that this only should be shown to the assize, and the Lords advised the assessors to cause the Earl condescend upon his claim, and to let the party see the verification in judgement, before the matter should be put to any inquest.
