BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Chisholm v Pringle. [1630] 1 Brn 310 (18 March 1630) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1630/Brn010310-0812.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR GEORGE AUCHINLECK OF BALMANNO.
Date: Chisholm
v.
Pringle
18 March 1630 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The Lords sustain sometimes poindings and denunciations at places accustomed within regalities, albeit the same be not at the head burgh of the regality: as at the tree of Torphichen, for the regality thereof; and af Kilope-gate, for the regality of Slaw; albeit the town of Kirkliston be the head burgh of the regality.
Page 188.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting