BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> La. Maxwell v Her Tenants. [1630] Mor 2229 (18 March 1630)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1630/Mor0602229-096.html
Cite as: [1630] Mor 2229

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1630] Mor 2229      

Subject_1 CITATION.
Subject_2 SECT. XXI.

Citation in Processes of Mails and Duties and Removings.

La Maxwell
v.
Her Tenants

Date: 18 March 1630
Case No. No 96.

In a removing at the instance of a lady tercer kenned, there was found no necessity to call a compriser from her defunct husband, tho' infeft and in possession of the rents.


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

In a removing Lady Maxwell contra Her Tenants, she being served, and upon a precept of the macers, before whom she was served, being kenned to her terce, produced the instrument of kenning for her title; and the Mr of Yester's son, who, upon comprising from the heritor, was infeft by public infeftment in the land, and by virtue thereof divers years in possession, being alleged to be a necessary party, who was not warned nor summoned, as he ought to have been to this pursuit; and also it being alleged, that the kenning, without production of the service, could not be a title to the pursuer for this pursuit; the allegeances were repelled, and the kenning found enough to instruct this pursuit as a sasine, without necessity of the charter or warrant thereof; and that there was no necessity to produce the service, or to warn the compriser, albeit infeft and in possession, no more than there was necessity to warn the Earl of Nithsdale heritor, from whom the lands were comprised, who was the heir or apparent heir of her husband, by whose decease she hath right to her terce.

Act. Douglas. Alt. Sharp. Clerk, Hay. Fol. Dic. v. 1. p. 140. Durie, p. 507.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1630/Mor0602229-096.html