BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Hunter v Halliburton. [1632] Mor 16880 (1 December 1632)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1632/Mor3816880-102.html
Cite as: [1632] Mor 16880

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

[1632] Mor 16880      
Subject_1 WRIT.
Subject_2 SECT. IV.

Instrumentary Witnesses.

Hunter
 v.
Halliburton

Date: 1 December 1632
Case No. No. 102.

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

It being objected, That a submission, and a decreet-arbitral following thereupon, wanted witnesses, the objection was repelled, because the submission was signed by the parties and four arbiters; and the blank on the back of the submission, in which the decreet was filled up, was signed by the parties, and three of the arbiters, which was sufficient, being only for a sum of money, not exceeding £1000.

 Durie.

*** This case is No. 292. p. 11620. voce Prescription.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1632/Mor3816880-102.html