BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
College of Glasgow v Stuart. [1633] Mor 15631 (20 February 1633)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1633/Mor3615631-018.html Cite as:
[1633] Mor 15631
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The College of Glasgow having right to the teinds of the parish of Govan, and having recovered decreet conform, in anno 1585, raised letters, and charged Mr. Patrick Stuart for the rental bolls of the lands of Bashagrie, for the years 1629, 1630, and 1631. He suspended, upon this reason, That he could not be subject in payment of the rental bolls, because, thirty or forty years bygone, he was never in use of payment thereof, but only of a certain silver duty, sometimes more, sometimes less, according as the teinds were thought worth, by estimation of men that valued them. Answered, He offered to prove, that the College obtained sundry and divers decreets against the heritors and tenants of the same room for payment of the same rental bolls charged for; and so the same teind bolls being a constant rent and duty pertaining to the College once, and established in their persons, by divers decreets, a part of the patrimony thereof, whatever duty hath been received since by the masters of the teinds thereof, could not prejudge the body of the College of their patrimony for years to come, so established by sentences, but they may still, at their pleasure, have recourse to the bolls once paid. Answered, The chargers having once passed from the payment of the bolls, cannot, after so long a desuetude, have recourse to them, especially where the suspender is content to give that which is naturally due, viz. the teind sheaves. The Lords repelled the allegeance, in respect of the reply, without prejudice to the suspender, in time coming, to make offer of the teind sheaves to the chargers.
