BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Greir of Barrarge v The Laird of Closburn. [1636] 1 Brn 97 (21 July 1636) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1636/Brn010097-0184.html |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR ALEXANDER GIBSON, OF DURIE.
Date: Greir of Barrarge
v.
The Laird of Closburn
21 July 1636 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Certain lands being adjudged to a creditor, whereupon the L. Closburn, who was superior to the lands adjudged, being charged to receive the creditor in the vassal's place; who suspending, that he ought not to do it, while he got a year's duty paid him, according to the order kept in comprisings, seeing adjudications are of the same nature, and in every thing alike and equal, in so far as concerns the superior's receiving and changing of his vassals;—the Lords found the letters orderly proceeded, notwithstanding of the reason, and that they could not compel the creditor to pay a year's duty to the superior, as is used in comprisings; for albeit there may be alike and the same reason for adjudications in this case, as for comprisings, yet seeing there are express laws and Acts of Parliament for comprisings, which are not for adjudications,—the Lords found that they could not extend the Acts, which made only mention of comprisings, that the superior should have a year's duty, for entry of the compriser, and doth not make any such mention of adjudications; it being also clear, that the Act which makes mention of adjudications, is done in the same Parliament wherein the Act of comprising was done, viz. the one the sixth Act, and the other the seventh Act, Par. 1621; and that the said Act of adjudication, in sundry parts, has relation to the preceding immediate Act of comprisings, and makes them alike in sundry other points, and has no ordinance in this point; and the Lords thought, that their power reached not safely to them to make any new law, where there was no practique thereanent before; but the Lords ordained the parties to travel, to see if they could agree amongst themselves, for a composition to be paid: which may appear very considerable, seeing the superior ought not to be compelled to change his vassal, not being satisfied therefore, no more than he can be compelled to receive a stranger, or a singular successor, upon his vassal's resignation unsatisfied; otherwise the creditor and the vassal debtor may ever collude to the superior's prejudice.
Act. Maxwel. Alt. Cunninghame. Vid. 20th January 1637, betwixt the same parties.
Page 819.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting
