BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Cornelius Crawfurd of Jordanhill, v M'Cailzone and Others. [1663] 2 Brn 311 (28 November 1663) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1663/Brn020311-0597.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER LORD FOUNTAINHALL.
Date: Cornelius Crawfurd of Jordanhill,
v.
M'Cailzone and Others
28 November 1663 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Mr. Ninian Campbell, minister at Roseneth, in anno 1656, by his bond, grants him to have received from Cornelius Crawfurd of Jordanhill, the sum of L.754; and for the said Cornelius his surer repayment thereof, he infefts him in an annual of L.44. 12s. 8d. as effeiring to the said sum of L.754, to be uplifted out of the three merk land of Carreask and Balingoune, within the Lordship of Cavell and Sheriffdom of Argyle. Cornelius afterwards coming to know that the said Mr. Ninian had some monies in the parishioners' hands, he arrests the same: and then (Mr. Ninian being dead,) he pursues to make furthcoming; summoning thereto the relict and his son, with his curators for their interest, if he any have. For instructing his summons, [he] produces in presence of the Lords the bond granted him by Mr. Ninian, his instrument of seasine, with the letters of arrestment, and their executions; and what cannot be verified by thir, he is content to refer to the defenders (in whose hands the arrestment was made) their oaths of verity.
This the Lords found relevant; and therefore assigned him a day against which he should summon them to that effect. Which he having done, and they failyieing, they were held as confessed; and decreet given against them, ordaining them to answer the pursuer in his desire of the libel.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting