BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Cornelius Inglis v Mr Rodger Hog. [1664] 2 Brn 136 (22 December 1664) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1664/Brn020136-0358.html |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JAMES DALRYMPLE OF STAIR.
Date: Cornelius Inglis
v.
Mr Rodger Hog
22 December 1664 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Mr Cornelius Inglis, being infeft upon an apprising, pursues a removing; compearance is made for Mr Rodger Hog, who alleged, That he is also infeft, and had charged the superior, though after the first appriser, and had possessed seven years, by lifting the mails and duties; and therefore craved the benefit of a possessory judgment. The Lords, having considered the case amongst themselves, whether an apprising and charge, without infeftment, could give the benefit of a possessory judgment, they were equally divided in their votes; and the President resolved, before he gave his vote, to settle the parties.
Vol. I, Page 245.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting
