BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> William Kintore v Logan and John Boyd. [1665] 1 Brn 512 (28 June 1665) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1665/Brn010512-1345.html |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN BAIRD OF NEWBYTH.
Date: William Kintore
v.
Logan and John Boyd
28 June 1665 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In a pursuit, Mr William Kintore against Logan and John Boyd, for tutorcounts, it being alleged by the defenders, That Ought and Should intromit was not relevant, and that the tutors were only liable for their actual intromissions, and that they were not liable for usuræ usurarum;—
The Lords found, That a tutor ought and should intromit; and that the same, being libelled, was relevant; and found, that tutors were liable for the annualrents of the annualrents post tutelam, but not durante tutela.
Page 31.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting
