BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Grants and Row v Viscount of Stormont. [1665] Mor 13505 (15 December 1665)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1665/Mor3113505-034.html
Cite as: [1665] Mor 13505

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1665] Mor 13505      

Subject_1 REDUCTION.

Grants and Row
v.
Viscount of Stormont

Date: 15 December 1665
Case No. No 34.

Effect or producaon for non-production.


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

David Viscount of Stormont having obtained a decreet of reduction against Grants, of their right of certain, lands, for not production. Grants and ——— Row, did reduce the said decreet against , now Viscount of Stormont, upon production of the rights called for in the first decreet; and in this reduction, the Lords did suffer and admit the said Viscount to insist in the said first reduction, he producing the said David Viscount of Stormont his right and instructing that he represents him; though the said first process was not transferred in the person of the said Viscount active, and against the pursuers of this reduction passive; and the summons of reduction, whereupon the first decreet proceeded, was not produced; which the Lords allowed to be supplied by production of the decreet, and a paper containing such reasons of reduction, as Stormont thought fit to give in; and that in respect it was the fault of the defenders in the reduction, that the writs were not then produced; and they and those having right from them being reponse, is was just that Storment and his heirs should be likewise reponed.

Dirleton, No 7. p. 4.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1665/Mor3113505-034.html