BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> James Johnston of Sheins v Mary Arnot. [1669] Mor 15793 (24 July 1669)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1669/Mor3615793-021.html
Cite as: [1669] Mor 15793

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1669] Mor 15793      

Subject_1 TENOR.

James Johnston of Sheins
v.
Mary Arnot

Date: 24 July 1669
Case No. No. 21.

The tenor of an assignation found sufficiently proved by the following adminicles; a back-bond granted by the assigner to to the cedent, in which it was fully narrated; and a comprising following up on it.


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

In a summons for proving the tenor of an assignation to a comprising made by Mr. Samuel Johnston to Sir Alexander Fowlis of Colingtoun, of the lands of Haprig and others, against John Arnot, there being produced sufficient adminicles, viz. a back-bond granted by Cohngtoun, with the disposition made in favours of Mr. Samuel, conform to the back-bond, wherein the assignation, with the date thereof, were particularly set down, it was debated amongst the Lords, if there was a necessity of the probation of the tenor, by witnesses who had seen the same; and, notwithstanding thereof, they did decern, and found the tenor proved, conform to the back-bond and disposition, in respect it was in re antiqua, and that the assignation was lost through the troubles of the time, and that Colingtoun’s son and his brother, did declare, upon oath, that they knew certainly that Collingtoun, had right by assignation; and, in respect that his name was but borrowed, did grant the back-bond and disposition whereupon Mr. Samuel was infeft under the Great Seal.

Gosford MS. p. 76.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1669/Mor3615793-021.html