BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Helen Hamilton v Wm. Bell and Others. [1671] 2 Brn 532 (25 February 1671)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1671/Brn020532-0901.html Cite as:
[1671] 2 Brn 532
Subject_2 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER, LORD FOUNTAINHALL.
Helen Hamilton v. Wm Bell and Others.
Date: 25 February 1671
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
This is the relict of James Bell the merchant, who as donatrix to her husband's escheat, pursues a special declarator against several alleged debtors to the said James the rebel; and amongst others William Bell his brother being called, and all being referred to his oath, I alleged I would take no day for producing him, because I offered me to prove, that after a fitted account betwixt this pursuer's husband and the defender, the defender was so far from being debtor to him in any sums of money, that to the contrary he acknowledges himself to be debtor to William, now defender, in L.36 Sterling; and lest they say that William might be debtor to the rebel for causes after that, it is answered, that cannot be, because this fitted account is subscribed on the day immediately before James died. Vide infra, No. 711, Deans and Purves [18th January 1678.]
To this it was answered,—That this fitted account being subscribed by the rebel long after his denunciation to the horn, there being jus quæsitum Domino Regi superiori, ejusque fisco per rebellionem, he could then do no deed to the prejudice of the king's fisk or his donatar. Yea, in the case of Glover and George Bayne, the Lords found a rebel after he was registrate at the horn, could not assign a debt owing to him, in satisfaction of a debt owing by him to one of his creditors. Replied,—That this account being before the gift or general declarator, it were a hard matter to find that he could not therein declare he was addebted to his brother in L.36, upon the casting up of all accounts betwixt them. I confess, deeds after the gift or declarator by the rebel, may be upon very plausible grounds called in question; but to quarrel all his actings from the time of the denunciation, seems very hard and of dangerous consequence. Yet my Lord Advocate inclined to find that he could not fit an account after he was lying at the horn. Infra No. 422, and 479.
