BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Monsieur Jamart, Frenchman, v Henry Jossie. [1672] 1 Brn 659 (3 July 1672) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1672/Brn010659-1612.html |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR PETER WEDDERBURN, LORD GOSFORD.
Date: Monsieur Jamart, Frenchman,
v.
Henry Jossie
3 July 1672 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In the foresaid action, Jamart against Jossie, It being alleged for the defender, That he ought to be absolved, because, by the custom of Bourdeaux and Act of Parliament thereof, whensoever a debtor became insolvent, the greatest part of his creditors entering into a contract of policy, whereby the debtor dispones to them his estate, it secures him against all the rest of the creditors, albeit they be not consenters, that they can never use either personal execution against him, nor pursue for any part of his estate, but to be divided amongst them all: Likeas the said creditors, who had contracted, did compear, by their proctors for their interests, and concurred for the defender.
It was replied, That albeit the said custom of Bourdeaux might be binding against all Frenchmen who lived within the jurisdiction of the Parliament of Bourdeaux, yet the defender being a Scotsman, and after great trust given him in Bourdeaux, for which he subscribed bonds, being retired to Scotland, where he had means and estate, he was liable in Scotland, both as to personal and real execution.
The Lords did repel the defence, and found, That if these particular customs should take place and be sustained here, or without the jurisdiction where they were in force, it would destroy all trust and commerce amongst merchants, who might easily transport themselves to other places, after they had sent away their stocks and commodities for which they had gotten trust upon their personal bond and security.
Page 267.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting
