BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Lowrie v Angus. [1676] 2 Brn 212 (5 December 1676) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1676/Brn020212-0472.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JAMES DALRYMPLE OF STAIR.
Date: Lowrie
v.
Angus
5 December 1676 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
[See page 208.]
The process betwixt the parties being discussed, and observed upon the 14th day of November last, yet being heard and reported again, the charger Alleged that it was the custom of all provident skippers to have a pump-stelling covered with pitched canvas, to guard against the spouting of the pump; which was wanting in this ship, and therefore the damage sustained by the charger was through his fault: neither is there any cause condescended upon, whereby the ship or pump became leaky, which could not be foreseen at the loosing, conform to the former interlocutor; and, therefore, the charger craved his allegeance to be admitted to his probation; specially seeing the skipper's witnesses were to be his own seamen, and it would be of dangerous consequence if the spoiling of merchants' goods might be evacuated by such probations.
The Lords would prefer neither party to the probation; but, before answer to the relevancy, allowed either party to adduce witnesses, what the custom of skippers to secure their pumps was, and what was the cause of this pump's becoming leaky or spouting, or if there was any storm or stress of weather in the voyage.
Vol. II, Page 471.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting