BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> John Findlay, Waiter in Leith, v Thomas Robertson, late Treasurer in Edinburgh. [1676] 3 Brn 105 (8 November 1676) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1676/Brn030105-0102.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER OF FOUNTAINHALL
Subject_2 WINTER SESSION 1976.
Date: John Findlay, Waiter in Leith,
v.
Thomas Robertson, late Treasurer in Edinburgh
8 November 1676 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Findlay having charged the said Thomas upon a decreet of the Sheriffs of Edinburgh for L.172, contained in a subscribed account, it was suspended on this reason, That the truth of the account, and articles thereof, being referred to Thomas his oath, his procurator, without his knowledge, had taken a day to produce him, and not being advertised, the term was circumduced, and he holden as confessed, and decreet given against him; whereas he in manner foresaid purged his contumacy, offered to refund to the charger the expenses of the decreet, condescended on the exorbitancy of sundry of the articles, and craved to be reponed to his oath.
Strathuird inclined to repone him, but they opponed the decreet, and no reasonable cause alleged to take off contumacy, such as sickness, absence forth of the town at that time, or the like; whereupon we deferred the truth and reasonableness of the articles of the count to the charger's own oath, who compearing, deponed the same were just and true: whereon Thomas Robertson agreed with him, and gave him his money. See the information apud me. Vide supra, December 1669, Semple and Walker, No. 6.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting