BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
John Kincaid v Gordon of Aberzeldie. [1677] 3 Brn 147 (00 June 1677)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1677/Brn030147-0176.html
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER OF FOUNTAINHALL Subject_2 SUMMER SESSION.
John Kincaid v. Gordon of Aberzeldie
1677.
June.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Mr John Kincaid, advocate, pursues Gordon of Aberzeldie upon the passive titles, (see the preceding number, sections 5, 6, 7, and 8,) for payment of a debt owing by his father; and for purging his intromission with the rents of lands. He having produced a tolerance from the donatar to the liferent, the tolerance was offered to be improven. Whereon Aberzeldy took it up, and the Lords allowed him to pass from it; (which is strange, and may encourage all falsehood;) and to propone a new dressed defence, viz. that the escheat was gifted and declared. Which they found relevant, per se, to purge the passive title of vitious intromitter, he being singly countable to the donatar; and so would not burden him to subsume that he bruiked and possessed by his tolerance and licence. 2do, He defended himself upon a comprising of his father's lands, which he had acquired, and so was a singular successor. Mr John Kincaid offered to redeem him, conform to the 62d act of Parliament in 1661, between debtor and creditor.
Answered,—Mr John was only a personal creditor, and so by the act of Parliament 1661, had no interest to redeem, the act only allowing that benefit to posterior apprisers.
Replied,—A personal creditor may as well redeem from an apparent heir buying in rights on his predecessor's estate, as he may reduce deeds ex capite inhibitionis, or ex capite lecti ægritudinis, though he establish no real right in his person. However, as it is safest, so it is very easy for the personal creditor, who as yet, hath neither adjudged, nor apprised, to make up a real right in his person, by adjudication or apprising, and that will give him an undoubted interest to redeem the apparent heir. Vide supra, 5th July, 1671, Kirkconnell, No. 204, Only the order of redemption must be used within ten years after the heir has acquired the right of apprising or adjudication in his person, or in another's to his behoof, (for thus requires the act 1661;) and not at any time within ten years after the legal of the said apprisings is expired, though it should be longer since the apparent heir had purchased it; as some, by mistake, would have it to be.
