BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> M'Kenzie of Suddy v Grahame of Drynie. [1678] Mor 12325 (30 November 1678)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1678/Mor2912325-096.html
Cite as: [1678] Mor 12325

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1678] Mor 12325      

Subject_1 PROOF.
Subject_2 DIVISION I.

Allegeances how relevant to be proved.
Subject_3 SECT. III.

What Proof relevant to take away Writ.

M'Kenzie of Suddy
v.
Grahame of Drynie

Date: 30 November 1678
Case No. No 96.

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

The Lords refused to sustain this reason of reduction of a decreet, That the clerk had drawn the interlocutor contrary to the testimonies of the witnesses; for this would bring all decreets overhead, by fixing a pretended guilt on the clerks. Thereafter the Lords renewed their act for sealing the deposition; but, before extracting the decreet, the Lords will not refuse to review, as in Tweedale and Drummelzier's case.

Fol. Dic. v. 2. p. 223. Fountainhall, MS.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1678/Mor2912325-096.html