BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Gordon or Glendinning v Maxwell. [1678] Mor 12533 (15 February 1678) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1678/Mor2912533-416.html Cite as: [1678] Mor 12533 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1678] Mor 12533
Subject_1 PROOF.
Subject_2 DIVISION III. Public Instrument, how far Probative.
Subject_3 SECT. IV. Decrees, Acts of Court, &c.
Date: Gordon or Glendinning
v.
Maxwell
15 February 1678
Case No.No 416.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
It being objected against an act of Court, bearing a wife's judicial ratification, that it was not subscribed by her the party; answered, By act 83d, Parliament 1481, the act of Court subscribed by the proper officer is a legal proof of the fact. Answered, The intention of that act is not to fix what shall be understood a legal proof of a wife's judicial ratification, but that a judicial ratification shall be effectual in law to bar any challenge upon the head of force or fear. The Lords sustained the objection, and found the act not probative.
*** This case is No 353. p. 6144. voce Husband and Wife.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting