BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Hope of Craighall v Erskine of Otterstone. [1680] 3 Brn 358 (4 June 1680) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1680/Brn030358-0465.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER OF FOUNTAINHALL
Subject_2 SUMMER SESSION.
Date: Hope of Craighall
v.
Erskine of Otterstone
4 June 1680 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Hope of Craighall pursues Erskine of Otterstone, his vassal, for non-entry. Alleged,—Absolvitor, because he is infeft on a precept of clare constat. Replied,—The precept is null, for his act of curatory appoints three to be a quorum; and it is only subscribed by one of them, viz. Mr Archibald Hope. Duplied,—That is nullitas facti, and so only receivable in a reduction. 2do, Offers to prove, by production of seven or eight several evidents, that Mr Archibald acted as sole curator; which is sufficient warrant to assoilyie him from an odious non-entry.—This seemed relevant, but it was elided by this triply,—They offered to prove that the precept was never delivered to him, but viis et modis unwarrantably got up from one in whose hands it was conditionally consigned, and that without performance of the condition. This triply was sustained.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting