BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Jean Callender v My Lord Saline's Daughters. [1684] 2 Brn 52 (00 January 1684) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1684/Brn020052-0143.html Cite as: [1684] 2 Brn 52 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1684] 2 Brn 52
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR ROGER HOG OF HARCARSE.
Jean Callender
v.
My Lord Saline's Daughters
1684 .January .Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
A man having a bond of 3000 merks, to himself and his wife, in liferent, &c. whom he was formerly obliged, by contract of marriage, to provide to the liferent of 5000 merks; she, after his decease, pursuing for the annual-rent of the bond, the debtor pleaded compensation upon sums belonging to him which the pursuer's husband intromitted with. Answered, The compensation can only affect the fee, and not the liferent, which is secured to the pursuer by the provision in the bond. Replied, It is usual for men to provide the liferent of sums
to their wives, and yet, being master of the bonds, to give them back, and uplift the money without the wife's consent; and, consequently, they might discharge or extinguish the same by compensation. Duplied, When such a thing is intended, the bond uses to bear a faculty to the husband to uplift without the wife's consent, and this bond must be presumed to have been so conceived, in implement of the contract of marriage, although it do not expressly relate thereto. The Lords found the answer and duply for the relict relevant, though no infeftment on the bond had passed in her person; and that the grounds of compensation, prior to the bond, could not be obtruded against the wife, seeing the obligement to pay annual-rent to her was a passing from all these grounds. Page 93, No. 361.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting
