BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> The Earl of Northesk v Sir Patrick Hepburn. [1685] 2 Brn 77 (00 March 1685)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1685/Brn020077-0203.html

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1685] 2 Brn 77      

Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR ROGER HOG OF HARCARSE.

The Earl of Northesk
v.
Sir Patrick Hepburn

1685. March.

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

In a competition between Sir Patrick Hepburn, who adjudged, without taking infeftment, Dougal M'Pherson's adjudication of some lands, whereupon no infeftment had followed, and my Lord Northesk, who two years after also adjudged from Dougal, and took infeftment;—Alleged for Sir Patrick, That an adjudication without infeftment, being transmissible by assignation, an adjudication thereof is a legal assignation, carrying the right, and needed no infeftment. Answered for Northesk, That not only had Dougal an adjudication, without infeftment in his person, but Sir Patrick, before his own adjudication, stood infeft in a right in trust for Dougal, so as Dougal, the common debtor, must be considered as having infeftment in the lands; and therefore Northesk's adjudication being completed by infeftment, it is the first effectual right; and Sir Patrick's, though prior, can only come in pari passu. Replied for Sir Patrick, Esto the infeftment was intrusted for Dougal,—the right, in his person, by the back-bond, not being real, but only a personal obligement to force Sir Patrick to denude, the same fell under Sir Patrick's adjudication, which needed no infeftment to complete it; and Northesk, being without year and day, could not come in pari passu. The Lords sustained the allegeance made for Northesk; which is irregular.

Page 77, No. 314.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1685/Brn020077-0203.html