BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
John Lauder v John Robertson. [1687] 3 Brn 659 (7 December 1687)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1687/Brn030659-1010.html
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER OF FOUNTAINHALL Subject_2 SUMMER SESSION.
Date: 7 December 1687
John Lauder v. John Robertson
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
John Lauder, chirurgeon-apothecary, having charged Mr John Robertson, portioner in Tranent, on a bond of 1000 merks for a prentice-fee with the suspender's brother; who alleged he would not have bound him, if it had not been in contemplation of his residing in Edinburgh, and that he has gone to Kirkcaldy:—Answered,—The master is best judge of his own conveniency, and where he is best employed; and the boy must follow him, and will get his freedom in Edinburgh notwithstanding.
The Lords, on Redford's report, repel the reasons of suspension, and find the letters orderly proceeded, if it appear, that, notwithstanding of the charger's removal to Kirkcaldy, the suspender will have his freedom at Edinburgh; the charger being always obliged to book the suspender, when the time comes by the custom of the town. And accordingly John Lauder got a testificate from the deacon and brethren of the trade, bearing, that he would get his freedom notwithstanding of the removal out of Edinburgh. Whereupon the Lords decerned.
