BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Andrew Johnston v Johnston of Lockerbie. [1688] Mor 17063 (00 February 1688) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1688/Mor3817063-345.html Cite as: [1688] Mor 17063 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1688] Mor 17063
Subject_1 WRIT.
Subject_2 SECT. XII. Penalty of falsifying Writs.
Andrew Johnston
v.
Johnston of Lockerbie
1688 .February .
Case No.No. 345.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In an improbation of the date of a marginal note wanting witnesses, the Lords found, That the user might prove it by the pursuer's oath, without necessity to abide at it, as in the case of positive falsehood; and that though the pursuer should not by his oath acknowlege the date, the marginal note would only fall, and not the whole writ, upon the brocard falsum in uno falsum in omnibus, which holds only in positive falsehoods, at least in articulis connexis. And here the subscription to the marginal note was not denied, but only it was quarrelled as not of the date of the body of the writ.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting