BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Hary Sinclair of Carlourie v Alexander Fletcher of Aberlady. [1692] 4 Brn 32 (21 December 1692) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1692/Brn040032-0064.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER OF FOUNTAINHALL.
Date: Hary Sinclair of Carlourie
v.
Alexander Fletcher of Aberlady
21 December 1692 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Hary Sinclair of Carlourie, against Alexander Fletcher of Aberlady, who alleged his father was holden as confessed on a debt, as due by him to Hay, formerly of Aberlady, to whom he was truly owing nothing, and was minor; and now his heir ought to be reponed against that decreet.
Answered,—If he was alive, he would not oppose it; but by his death he has lost the mean of his probation; and to repone against that decreet is to discharge the debt.
The Lords found, if he had been within fourteen, he could not have been holden as confessed, not being obliged at that age to depone; but he being then married, and near twenty years old, they could not remedy it; and therefore sustained the decreet against this child, now his heir.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting