BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> James Bayn v - . [1692] Mor 11092 (21 December 1692) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1692/Mor2611092-293.html Cite as: [1692] Mor 11092 |
[New search] [Contents list] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1692] Mor 11092
Subject_1 PRESCRIPTION.
Subject_2 DIVISION IX. Triennial Prescription.
Subject_3 SECT. IV. Triennial Prescription of Accounts, Act 1579. c. 83.
Date: James Bayn
v.
-
21 December 1692
Case No.No 293.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
James Bayn wright, having reclaimed against an interlocutor, finding that wright and mason-work not pursued for within three years, fell within the compass of the triennial prescription, introduced by the 83d act 1579; alleging, That was only in merchants accompts,. and not in such tradesmen's, where the work was durable and permanent for many years; and that rents of lands in the country, and seamens wages, had been found not to be included in that act;—the Lords found no reason of diversity, but that they prescribed as well as other tradesmen's accompts.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting