BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> John Irving of Drumcoltran v The Earl of Lithgow. [1694] 4 Brn 116 (5 January 1694)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1694/Brn040116-0268.html

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1694] 4 Brn 116      

Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER OF FOUNTAINHALL.

John Irving of Drumcoltran
v.
The Earl of Lithgow

Date: 5 January 1694

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

John Irving of Drumcoltran, against the Earl of Lithgow, for paying him the rents of the forfeited lands of Auchinhay, which belonged to one Fullarton, who was forfeited for being at Bothwel-Bridge in 1679; and whereto Lithgow, being donatar, he had transacted with John Irving, and disponed the lands to him; and from which Irving alleged he was debarred by the forfeited person's brother and tenants, who refused to pay him; and he could not remove them, because the Earl had not given him a charter whereon he might have been infeft. The Lords considered that Drumcoltran had been remiss in pursuing for maills and duties, and that Lithgow was in peaceable possession before he denuded himself by that disposition, and that Irving should have continued that same possession; therefore they found it relevant to assoilyie Lithgow from being liable to pay him the rents, if he prove that he was in peaceable possession of the lands at the time of his disponing to John Irving. Some of the Lords thought it reasonable that Lithgow should count to him for the rents of such of the lands as the rebel's brother possessed by a right of wadset: for that was a legal, at least a colourable title to debar Irving from that part till it was discussed by a reduction.

Vol. I. Page 588.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1694/Brn040116-0268.html