BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> George Winram of Eyemouth v James Johnston of Wamphray. [1694] 4 Brn 153 (13 February 1694) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1694/Brn040153-0347.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER OF FOUNTAINHALL.
Date: George Winram of Eyemouth
v.
James Johnston of Wamphray
13 February 1694 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The Lords found the bond of 10,000 merks was moveable, and carried by Winram's arrestment, and that it fell not under Wamphray's apprising, albeit the bond carried a clause that the land should stand affected therewith; for that is not the habile way to make a right heritable. They also found the backbond produced was not ad idem; and, therefore, being different, both in the sum and term of payment, the quality thereof could not affect this bond. And found, Wamphray's arrestment being on a dependence which had never yet taken effect by a decreet, so that they were in mora, they could not compete with Winram's arrestment laid on upon a liquid bond.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting