BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Pringle of Renniston v James Rait, Merchant in Edinburgh. [1694] 4 Brn 174 (22 June 1694) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1694/Brn040174-0394.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER OF FOUNTAINHALL.
Date: Pringle of Renniston
v.
James Rait, Merchant in Edinburgh
22 June 1694 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In the charge, at Pringle of Renniston's instance, against James Rait, merchant in Edinburgh, and his bill of suspension, reported by Crocerig, the Lords repelled this reason, That he offered to prove he entered all his goods at Kelso, and yet the transire he got did not contain the whole, whereby the goods, not mentioned, were seized by the waiters at Edinburgh; and the bond being for the custom of these goods, he ought to have deduction effeiring to his damage.
The Lords refused to pass the bill, and found it not probable by witnesses, but only by Renniston's oath or writ.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting