BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Lord Polwart v Sir James Dick. [1694] 4 Brn 204 (27 July 1694) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1694/Brn040204-0462.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER OF FOUNTAINHALL.
Date: Lord Polwart
v.
Sir James Dick
27 July 1694 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
My Lord Polwart against Sir James Dick, who refused to take a second term in Polwart's reduction and improbation, because he offered immediately to debate the nullity of Polwart's right, being entered by the king; whereas Home of North-Berwick was Heugh's superior, these lands not being annexed to the Crown, but expressly reserved out of the act of annexation, (being act 29th, 1587,) where it is disputable whether the superiority, or only the property, be excepted, as Polwart alleged.
The Lords, thinking this debate foreign hoc loco, they repelled it against the
taking of terms, not having been proponed at the first time; but reserved it in debating the reasons; and allowed Sir James a diligence for recovery of any writs he needed in the mean time.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting